If you are comparing Mouseflow vs Plerdy, the good news is both are still independent, self-serve platforms — unlike Hotjar, which folded into Contentsquare in 2025. Mouseflow is a Denmark-based behavior-analytics tool built around heatmaps, session replay, and automatic friction detection. Plerdy covers the same core behavior-analytics toolkit — heatmaps, session replay, conversion funnels — and adds pop-ups, native A/B testing, and an on-page SEO checker under one login, which matters if the reason you are comparing these two tools is to stop paying for a behavior-analytics tool and a separate SEO or CRO tool.
This guide compares both tools feature by feature — heatmaps, session recordings, form analytics, funnels, feedback, SEO checks, A/B testing, and pricing — and points out where each one is the more practical fit for your team.
Best For
Mouseflow
Plerdy
Heatmaps
Mouseflow
Plerdy
Session Replay
Mouseflow
Plerdy
Funnels And Analytics
Mouseflow
Plerdy
Feedback, Surveys And Forms
Mouseflow
Plerdy
SEO And CRO Tools
Mouseflow
Plerdy
Integrations And Privacy
Mouseflow
Plerdy
Pricing
Mouseflow
Plerdy
This is the single biggest structural gap between the two tools: Mouseflow is a focused behavior-analytics platform with no on-page technical SEO layer and no native pop-ups or A/B testing, while Plerdy ships heatmaps, session replay, and SEO monitoring under one login — useful if the same person or small team owns both CRO and SEO.
Plerdy is a conversion-rate-optimization and on-page SEO platform built for marketing, UX, and SEO teams that want one dashboard instead of three separate subscriptions. It combines behavior analytics (heatmaps, session replay, funnels), conversion tools (pop-ups, A/B testing, ecommerce tracking), and an automatic SEO checker with Google Search Console data.
Plerdy pros:
Plerdy cons:
Mouseflow is a behavior-analytics platform headquartered in Denmark, used by more than 210,000 teams to watch session recordings, build heatmaps, and score visitor friction automatically. It focuses on one job — understanding how visitors actually use a page — rather than bundling in SEO or marketing pop-ups.
Mouseflow pros:
Mouseflow cons:
Plerdy is a conversion-rate-optimization and on-page SEO platform built for marketing, UX, and SEO teams that want one dashboard instead of three separate subscriptions. It combines behavior analytics, conversion tools, and an automatic SEO checker with Google Search Console data.
Key features:
Use cases: in-house marketing/CRO teams that also own SEO; ecommerce teams diagnosing cart and checkout drop-off; agencies managing heatmap, funnel, and SEO reporting for multiple client sites without paying for three tools per client.
Mouseflow is a behavior-analytics platform for teams that want to watch and quantify how visitors actually use a page. It is best suited for UX researchers, product managers, and marketing teams that want deep session-level detail and automatic friction scoring without needing SEO or on-page A/B testing in the same tool.
Key features:
Use cases: product and UX research teams diagnosing friction on key flows; ecommerce and SaaS teams that want automatic form and funnel analytics; teams that already run SEO and A/B testing elsewhere and just need a dedicated behavior-analytics layer.
Neither tool is objectively "better" — they solve different-shaped problems. Mouseflow is the stronger pick for UX and product-research teams that want a focused, no-frills behavior-analytics tool and are comfortable running A/B testing and SEO in separate systems. Plerdy is the more practical choice for marketing, CRO, and SEO teams that want heatmaps, session replay, pop-ups, funnels, A/B testing, and an SEO checker under one transparent, self-serve subscription.
If the reason you searched "Mouseflow vs Plerdy" is to stop paying for a behavior-analytics tool and a separate SEO or A/B-testing tool, Plerdy's pricing page is the fastest way to see whether one platform can replace both.
If you are moving your tracking script from Mouseflow to Plerdy, here is what to plan for:
Both platforms record 100% of sessions on their respective plans without sampling, so the difference is not data quality — it is scope. Mouseflow's edge is depth on one job: its Friction Score automatically ranks rage clicks, dead clicks, mouse-outs, and errors so a UX researcher can triage a backlog of recordings without watching each one, and Mina AI extends that by letting you ask plain-language questions about the data. Six heatmap types, including a split-view mode for before/after comparisons, make it a strong pick for a team whose only job is behavior research.
Plerdy's edge is scope: the same login that runs heatmaps and session replay also runs an on-page SEO checker with Google Search Console data, pop-up forms with exit-intent and cart-abandonment triggers, and native A/B testing from the free plan. For a team that has to justify one subscription instead of three, that consolidation is often worth more than an extra heatmap type.
One practical note on pricing shape: Mouseflow's plans scale by monthly session volume (500 → 5,000 → 25,000 → 100,000), so traffic spikes can push a team into a higher tier mid-cycle. Plerdy's tiers scale by daily heatmap and monthly video-session limits instead, with SEO audits, pop-ups, and A/B testing included from the free plan rather than gated to enterprise tiers.
Both tools are actively reviewed on independent software-comparison platforms. Scores move over time, so treat this as a snapshot rather than a permanent ranking — always check the live page before quoting a number.
Independent review platforms give a more grounded picture than either vendor's own marketing page:
Mouseflow's review volume is larger than Plerdy's — it has a longer track record with UX and product teams. But on every platform above, Plerdy's average score is equal to or higher than Mouseflow's, which is worth factoring in alongside raw review count.
The practical difference: Plerdy publishes every tier's price on its pricing page, and SEO audits, pop-ups, and A/B testing are included from the free plan rather than gated behind higher tiers. Mouseflow also publishes its pricing openly, but it scales strictly by monthly session volume — check the current numbers on Mouseflow's pricing page before comparing totals, since SaaS pricing changes without notice.
Mouseflow: Free plan includes 500 sessions/month, 1 website project, 1 conversion funnel, and 1-month data retention. Essential starts at $25/month (5,000 sessions), Advanced at $109/month (25,000 sessions), Premium at $319/month (100,000 sessions, includes API and SSO), and Enterprise is a custom quote.
Plerdy: Free plan includes 100 heatmaps/day, 500 video sessions, 5,000 SEO audits, 100 pop-ups, and unlimited A/B testing. Startup starts from $21/month (billed annually), Scale from $42/month, Thrive from $70/month, and Enterprise from $97/month with scaling up to 50,000 heatmaps/day.
“Plerdy SEO checker is great. It gives you an overview of user devices over time.”
“Plerdy has a fair pricing policy compared to the alternative solutions.”
Yes, if you want heatmaps and session replay alongside pop-ups, funnels, A/B testing, and an on-page SEO checker in one self-serve platform. It is a closer fit for teams that own both CRO and SEO than for pure UX-research teams that only need Mouseflow's friction-scoring workflow.
Yes. Plerdy's Session Replay Software records visitor sessions and flags rage clicks, similar to Mouseflow's Friction Score.
Both have a free plan. Mouseflow's paid plans start at $25/month for 5,000 sessions and scale by session volume. Plerdy's paid plans start at $21/month (billed annually) and include SEO audits, pop-ups, and unlimited A/B testing from the free tier — features that are not part of Mouseflow at any price.
Plerdy includes an automatic SEO checker and Google Search Console integration inside the same dashboard as its heatmaps. Mouseflow does not offer on-page technical SEO auditing — it is a behavior-analytics tool only.
Plerdy includes native A/B testing from the free plan. Mouseflow does not have a built-in A/B testing engine, so teams that want to run controlled experiments alongside Mouseflow's behavior data need a separate testing tool.
Session recordings, heatmaps, and funnel definitions do not transfer between platforms. Export any historical reports you need, then run both tools in parallel for one to two weeks while you rebuild funnels and CSS-selector events in Plerdy.