See Where Money Burns $ Find Revenue Leaks ₴ See Why Visitors Don’t Buy € Stop Burning Ad Budget £ Find Where Sales Leak ¥ Stop Wasting Website Traffic $ Find What Kills Sales ₴
Hotjar vs FullStory is not the same comparison it was two years ago. Hotjar is no longer an independent product: it is part of Contentsquare, and hotjar.com/pricing now redirects straight to the Contentsquare pricing page. Fullstory, meanwhile, moved the opposite way — a generous free tier with 30,000 monthly sessions, and paid plans behind a sales conversation. So the real question is no longer “which tool has heatmaps?” but “which billing model, which data depth, and which team will actually open this tool every week?”
This comparison covers the same question in the ways people actually type it — FullStory vs Hotjar, which is better: Hotjar vs. FullStory, and Hotjar vs Full Story. It also puts Plerdy next to both, because the teams asking this question usually need more than replay: heatmaps, session recording, SEO audit, pop-ups, conversion funnels and A/B testing on one tag, on one bill.
Best For
Hotjar
FullStory
Plerdy
Heatmaps
Hotjar
FullStory
Plerdy
Session Replay
Hotjar
FullStory
Plerdy
Funnels And Analytics
Hotjar
FullStory
Plerdy
Feedback, Surveys And Forms
Hotjar
FullStory
Plerdy
SEO And CRO Tools
Hotjar
FullStory
Plerdy
Integrations And Privacy
Hotjar
FullStory
Plerdy
Pricing
Hotjar
FullStory
Plerdy
Website analytics tools should not be chosen only by brand name. Hotjar, FullStory, and Plerdy all help you understand user behavior, but the real difference is what kind of problem you want to solve first. If you need fast visual UX insights, Hotjar is usually easy to start with. If your product team needs deeper replay, funnels, and debugging, FullStory can be stronger. If you want UX analytics, SEO audit, popups, funnels, and A/B testing together, Plerdy deserves a closer look.
Hotjar is a popular behavior analytics platform for heatmaps, recordings, surveys, feedback, funnels, and user research. It is often a good fit when a marketer, UX specialist, or small product team wants to quickly see how visitors click, scroll, and react to a website.
Hotjar pros:
Hotjar cons:
FullStory is more product-analytics focused. It combines session replay, heatmaps, funnels, journey maps, user segments, sentiment signals, and debugging tools. This makes FullStory useful for SaaS products, mobile apps, and teams where product managers and engineers need to understand exactly where users struggle.
FullStory pros:
FullStory cons:
Hotjar helps teams understand what people do on a website and why they behave that way. Its main value is visual: heatmaps show clicks and scroll depth, recordings show real user sessions, and surveys help collect direct feedback. This is useful when a landing page looks fine, but users still ignore the CTA, leave the checkout, or stop reading before the important part.
For many teams, Hotjar is attractive because it is simple. A marketer can open a heatmap and quickly see whether users notice the hero button. A UX designer can compare desktop and mobile behavior. A product manager can use recordings and surveys to explain why a page needs changes. That is the core reason many people start their Hotjar vs FullStory comparison with Hotjar.
One thing that changed in 2025 and still confuses buyers: Hotjar is now a Contentsquare product. The Hotjar brand, dashboard and tracking script still exist, but the homepage and the pricing page both redirect to contentsquare.com, in-app billing may still show legacy Basic / Plus / Business / Scale tiers while the public site shows Free / Growth / Pro / Enterprise, and roadmap decisions are made inside a much larger experience-analytics suite. If you are comparing Hotjar vs FullStory on a multi-year horizon, you are really comparing Contentsquare's direction against Fullstory's.
FullStory is built more around the full digital experience. It records user behavior, helps analyze journeys, shows funnels, surfaces frustration signals, and gives teams more product analytics context. So, when the question is FullStory vs Hotjar, the answer often depends on how technical your team is and how deep the analysis must go.
FullStory can be especially useful for SaaS, apps, and larger product teams. If users fail inside a dashboard, get stuck after login, trigger errors, or abandon a complex flow, FullStory gives product and engineering teams more context. It is not only about seeing a heatmap. It is about understanding the full journey and the moments where the product breaks, confuses, or slows people down.
Plerdy answers the part of this comparison that neither Hotjar nor Fullstory is built for: what happens between the ranking and the purchase. On one tag it runs click and scroll heatmaps with per-element conversion value, session recording, technical SEO audit with Google Search Console keyword data, pop-ups, conversion funnels, eCommerce sales tracking and A/B testing. That matters because the usual failure mode is not a missing heatmap — it is a page that ranks, gets clicks on the CTA, and still earns nothing, and diagnosing that needs SEO and behaviour data in the same screen.
Plerdy is especially useful when SEO and UX problems overlap. For example, a page can rank but still convert badly. Or a CTA can get clicks, but the form can lose users. Or a landing page can have strong traffic from Google, but weak scroll depth and poor engagement. Plerdy lets teams check these problems together instead of jumping between separate SEO, heatmap, popup, and funnel tools.
There is no honest single winner for every business. Hotjar is usually better when you want a simple, visual tool for heatmaps, recordings, feedback, and surveys. FullStory is usually better when product and engineering teams need deeper session replay, journey analytics, and frustration signals. Plerdy is usually better when you want behavior analytics plus SEO, popups, funnels, eCommerce tracking, and A/B testing in one place.
So the better question is not “which is better: Hotjar vs. FullStory?” The better question is: what kind of decision do you need to make after opening the tool? If the answer is “fix UX fast,” Hotjar can work. If the answer is “debug product friction,” FullStory can work. If the answer is “improve traffic, UX, and conversions together,” Plerdy is often the more practical choice.
Typed the other way round — FullStory vs Hotjar — the question usually comes from an engineer, not a marketer, and it comes down to three mechanisms rather than to a feature checklist.
None of these three answers the question a marketer actually has — whether the page converts. That gap is why teams end up running a behaviour tool next to an SEO and CRO tool. Plerdy's heatmaps attach conversion value to individual elements, and the SEO checker and A/B testing run on the same tag, so “this button is clicked a lot” and “this button earns nothing” arrive in the same report.
Based on reviews, Hotjar vs FullStory usually becomes a discussion about simplicity versus depth. Hotjar is often praised for being easy to understand quickly. FullStory is often praised for deeper product analytics and more technical context. That does not make one tool “good” and the other “bad.” It just means they solve different parts of the same website analytics problem.
For a marketing website, ecommerce landing page, or quick UX audit, Hotjar may be enough. For a complex SaaS dashboard, app flow, onboarding issue, or support-heavy product, FullStory may give better context. For a team that also needs SEO audits, GSC keyword insights, popups, A/B testing, and conversion funnel analysis, Plerdy covers a wider marketing and CRO stack.
One pattern shows up across buyer interviews on both sides: the complaint is almost never about the tool's features, it is about who kept using it after month three. Hotjar accounts tend to stay open because a marketer opens a heatmap weekly; Fullstory accounts tend to go quiet unless a product analyst owns them, because autocaptured data needs curation to stay useful. Before you compare feature rows, decide which of those two people exists on your team — that single answer predicts renewal better than any review score.
The three tools now sit on three different billing philosophies, and that difference decides more budgets than any feature row above. Hotjar no longer prices itself. Since the Contentsquare merger, hotjar.com/pricing returns a 308 redirect to contentsquare.com/pricing, and what used to be one Hotjar bill is now split across separate Contentsquare product lines — Experience Analytics for heatmaps and replay, Voice of Customer for surveys. Entry price for Experience Analytics is $39 per month billed yearly, $49 billed monthly; the Free tier keeps session replay and unlimited heatmaps but only one month of data access. Anything above the entry rung is quote-based.
Fullstory prices nothing publicly above free. Its pricing page shows Fullstory Free — 30,000 sessions a month, 12 months of analytics retention, up to 10 seats — and then routes Business, Advanced and Enterprise into “Request pricing & demo”. Mobile analytics, Guides and Surveys, StoryAI and multi-org management are add-ons, so the quote you get is rarely the price you compared.
Plerdy prices everything publicly. Free forever, Startup at $21/mo yearly or $32 monthly, Scale $42/mo yearly, Thrive $70/mo yearly, Enterprise from $97/mo yearly, plus a 14-day trial on Scale limits with no card. For a team that has to defend a number in a budget sheet before signing, that is a practical difference, not a marketing one.
“Plerdy SEO checker is great. It gives you an overview of user devices over time.”
“Plerdy has a fair pricing policy compared to the alternative solutions.”
The main difference is focus. Hotjar is strong for heatmaps, recordings, surveys, feedback, and fast UX research. FullStory is stronger for product analytics, session replay, funnels, journey maps, user segments, and technical debugging. Hotjar is usually simpler for marketers. FullStory is usually deeper for product and engineering teams.
Hotjar is better if you need a simple tool for visual behavior analytics, heatmaps, surveys, and recordings. FullStory is better if you need deeper product analytics, replay, funnels, and debugging context. Plerdy is a better alternative if you also need SEO checks, popups, A/B testing, conversion funnels, and eCommerce tracking in one platform.
Yes. Hotjar has recordings that let teams watch real visitor sessions and understand where users move, click, scroll, and struggle. This helps connect heatmap data with real user behavior.
Yes. FullStory includes heatmaps, scroll maps, click maps, session replay, funnels, user segments, sentiment signals, and other product analytics features. It is often used when teams need more context than a simple heatmap view.
Neither Hotjar nor FullStory is mainly an SEO tool. They help with user behavior and experience analytics. If SEO checks, Google Search Console insights, and page-level SEO audits are important, Plerdy is a stronger option because it combines UX analytics with SEO tools.
Yes. Plerdy is a good alternative if your team wants more than heatmaps and recordings. It includes heatmaps, session replay, SEO audits, popups, conversion funnels, eCommerce tracking, A/B testing, and Google Search Console insights. That makes it useful for teams that want to improve UX, SEO, and conversions together.
Yes. FullStory offers FullstoryFree, which includes 30,000 monthly sessions and 12 months of analytics retention. Teams that need advanced capabilities or higher limits can move to a paid plan.
Hotjar vs Plerdy is useful because many teams do not only need heatmaps. They also need SEO audits, popups, funnels, A/B testing, and eCommerce conversion analysis. Hotjar is strong for behavior insights, while Plerdy covers a wider CRO and SEO workflow.
It depends on what breaks. For code-level UX bugs — errors, rage clicks, broken flows inside an app — Fullstory is the strongest of the three, because Fullcapture records the DOM and lets you re-query a session for events you never instrumented. For visual UX problems on a marketing site, Hotjar under Contentsquare is faster to read. For UX problems that are really conversion problems — a page that ranks and gets clicks but earns nothing — Plerdy is the more practical debugger, because heatmaps with element-level conversion value, session recording, SEO audit and A/B testing sit on one tag and one report.
Hotjar is part of Contentsquare. The product, the dashboard and the tracking script still carry the Hotjar name, but hotjar.com and hotjar.com/pricing both redirect to contentsquare.com, and what was one Hotjar subscription is now billed across separate Contentsquare product lines — Experience Analytics for heatmaps and session replay, Voice of Customer for surveys. Legacy Hotjar tier names may still appear inside existing accounts while the public site shows Free, Growth, Pro and Enterprise. Comparing Hotjar vs FullStory in 2026 therefore means comparing Contentsquare's roadmap against Fullstory's.